Sanction Framework for Hazing Violations

Hazing includes a wide range of behaviors—some less noticeable and more common, others more severe or disruptive. All forms of hazing are taken seriously to support a healthy University community. The examples provided are general and not exhaustive. Each report is reviewed individually, and University officials have the discretion to assess and respond appropriately.

Types of Hazing

Type 1: Subtle/Intimidation

Actions that create a power imbalance, often through ridicule, embarrassment, or humiliation. These actions may seem minor but still violate mutual respect. New members may feel pressured to tolerate these actions to maintain or gain acceptance, and some actions may also qualify as intimidation. Examples: 

• Deception or dishonesty
• Demerits or denied privileges
• Demeaning names
• Social isolation
• Silence with implied threats
• Line-ups, drills, or pointless tests
• Required items or clothing
• Unequal access to member privileges

Type 2: Harassment/Harm to Well-being

Actions that cause emotional distress or physical discomfort to make someone feel accepted. It often leads to confusion, frustration, and unnecessary stress, and in some cases, may cross the line into violent hazing. Examples: 

• Verbal abuse or threats
• Humiliating clothing or skits
• Forced personal chores (e.g., errands, cleaning)
• Sleep or hygiene deprivation
• Sexual simulations
• Pressure to harass others
• Disruption of academics

Type 3: Violence

Actions that have the potential to cause physical and/or emotional or psychological harm.

Examples:

• Physical abuse: beating, paddling, branding, bondage, abduction
• Forced or coerced substance use: alcohol, drugs, excessive food, non-edible or vile items, water intoxication
• Sexual humiliation: public or implied nudity      

Type 4: Aggravated/Repeated

Actions that are severe, pervasive, repeated, or potentially qualify as hate crimes. Repetitive hazing—regardless of its nature—is considered aggravated due to its cumulative impact.

HAZING SANCTIONS FRAMEWORK

A finding of responsibility for hazing may result in disciplinary action against both the student organization and individual members who planned, directed, or actively participated in the hazing.s

Sanctions are determined by factors such as the seriousness of the behavior, the impact it has caused, any previous conduct history, and how similar situations have been addressed in recent years. Each case is reviewed individually, considering any circumstances that may increase or lessen a response, aiming to support growth and protect the University community’s safety and well-being.

Minimum sanctions for hazing violations are listed in the Hazing Sanctions Framework.